About Abortion Are You Pregnant? Professional Education Publications and Research U.S. Public Policy In Canada Membership Support NAF About NAF
 Find a Provider | News | Blog | Get Involved | Action Alerts | Clinicians for Choice | En español | En français | Site Map | Contact Us | NAF Home
NAF Logo Public policy programs provide scientific and medical expertise to policy makers and ensure that the voices of abortion providers and patients are heard in policy forums across the country.
Public Policyin the states
Current Issues
in congress
in the executive branch
In the Courts
In The States
> Threats to Abortion
        Rights
> Ensuring Access
- Clinic Protection
international issues
policy reports
Resources
Patient Partnership
Search prochoice.org
Powered by
Google
NAF Hotline
1-800-772-9100
Find a provider:
1-877-257-0012

(no funding assistance provided on this line)

ENSURING ACCESS/Clinic Protection Bills


There are two main types of state bills that have been introduced to protect abortion providers from harassment and violent threats.

State FACE Acts

The first main type of provider protection legislation is the state FACE Act, modeled after the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act - the 1994 law that imposes federal civil and criminal penalties on those who use or threaten force to injure, intimidate, or interfere with access to abortion clinics.

California and New York have passed state versions of the FACE Act, while other states have introduced similar bills. These laws supplement existing federal protections for providers, for example by granting state law enforcement the authority to enforce the FACE Act.

Bubble/Buffer Zone Bills

The second main type of state provider protection legislation is the bubble/buffer zone bill. This bill creates an area of protection around those entering and leaving reproductive health care facilities or a buffer zone of protection around the health care facility itself. These bills allow patients and providers to enter and leave clinics free from harassment and intimidation while preserving free speech rights.

Massachusetts and Colorado have passed bubble/buffer zone laws, while other states have introduced similar bills.

Other Bills

In addition, some other states have taken creative approaches to clinic protection legislation. In 2006 in Washington, Governor Gregoire signed a bill that prevents insurance companies from dropping policy holders who are the victims of crimes. The legislature found that this protection was necessary since "access to insurance can be imperiled by the response of insurers to criminal acts."

Two affirmative bills were also signed into law in California in 2006. The first bill extends the unique Reproductive Rights Law Enforcement Act, requiring the state to collect and analyze information on anti-reproductive rights crimes. The second bill prohibits, under specific circumstances, the online posting, sale, trade or solicitation of home addresses, phone numbers, and pictures of reproductive health care providers and their patients. These bills provide the state with essential tools in the fight against anti-choice violence and harassment.

NAF website Copyright 2010 National Abortion Federation. Use of this site signifies your agreement to our Usage and Privacy Policy.