About Abortion Are You Pregnant? Professional Education Publications and Research U.S. Public Policy In Canada Membership Support NAF About NAF
 Find a Provider | News | Blog | Get Involved | Action Alerts | Clinicians for Choice | En español | En français | Site Map | Contact Us | NAF Home
NAF Logo Public policy programs provide scientific and medical expertise to policy makers and ensure that the voices of abortion providers and patients are heard in policy forums across the country.
Public PolicyGet Informed/Get Active
Current Issues
in congress
in the executive branch
In the Courts
In The States
international issues
policy reports
Resources
> NAF Took a Stand
- Executive Nominees
- Judicial Nominees
> In Their Own Words
> What's at Stake
> Bush's Ideal
             Supreme Court
             Justices
> O'Connor's Legacy
> Consultation &
             Consensus
> Samuel A. Alito
> Claude Allen
> Janice Rogers
             Brown
> Miguel Estrada
> Michael Fisher
> James Leon Holmes
> Brett Kavanaugh
> Carolyn B. Kuhl
> Harriet Miers
> Priscilla Owen
> Charles W.
             Pickering
> Bill Pryor
> John G. Roberts
> Diane Sykes
> Timothy Tymkovich
> Glossary
> Useful Links
Patient Partnership
Search prochoice.org
Powered by
Google
NAF Hotline
1-800-772-9100
Find a provider:
1-877-257-0012

(no funding assistance provided on this line)

NAF TOOK A STAND/JUDICIAL NOMINEES/Miguel Estrada


District of Columbia Circuit

The District of Columbia Circuit is considered to be the most powerful appeals court in the country. Located in DC, it has jurisdiction over federal agencies and a wide range of issues. Its decisions effect every citizen of the United States. The DC Circuit has also been a stepping-stone for appointment to the Supreme Court. Three justices on the Supreme Court previously sat on the DC Circuit: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas.

Mr. Estrada's personal story is compelling. His legal credentials are impressive. And I believe that the decision of the Bush White House to affirmatively act to add more Hispanics to the judiciary is appropriate.

But his views are so suspect that he has consistently refused to be candid to the Judiciary Committee. He has ducked the real issues and refused to provide the Senate with the legal documents he prepared that would give an insight into his legal thinking.

-- Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL)

  Experience:     
  1997 - present Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP
  1992 - 1997 Assistant to the Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, Solicitor General's Office
  1990 - 1992 Assistant U.S. Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York
  1989 - 1990, 1992 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
  1988 - 1989 Law Clerk to Justice Kennedy, Supreme Court of the United States
  1987 - 1988 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
  1986 - 1987 Law Clerk to Hon. Amalya L. Kearse, Second Circuit, United States Court of Appeals
 
  Education:
  1983 - 1986 Harvard Law School
  1980 - 1983 Columbia College
  1979 - 1980 State University of New York

Nomination Status:

Passed out of Judiciary Committee 9-8, Senate filibuster, 7th cloture vote rejected. Withdrew nomination on September 4, 2003.

Coalition for a Fair and Independant Judiciary

Television Ad (Windows Media Player file, 698K)
Press Release

Map of Circuit Courts

NAF website Copyright 2009 National Abortion Federation. Use of this site signifies your agreement to our Usage and Privacy Policy.